A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.

A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. John Gaule

It could not be said more elegantly - for something as complexed as a financial system to work we need to get back to simplicity! Design, at least Scandinavian, is based on simplicity and functionality - maybe finance needs to take it cue from design rather than mindless policiticans and policy makers.

I did guest hosting on CNBC this morning - always a good and lively crew in London, but I was somewhat surprised at how EVERYONE is arguing in the past! Listen - Its over! New paradigme, we are now in period of transistion for both the way the markets and banks works, but also for valuation metrics.

The back-fitting and mechanical approach to trading is out/done/busted! In is: risk management, grey hair (I did warn you all about this trend!), alpha and directional players with a view.

The world is full of opportunitites let me mention a few things:

• UK banks trades almost a tangible values! Something I said long ago Citi and other should as well. (Long RBS, HSBC, Danske)


• Cash rich companies like Apple, Microsoft, VISA, Mastercard trading at multi-year low multiples, then add Pharma (Novo, Pfizer), Maersk(shipping/oil) and you have value proporsitions not seen in 50, yes even 70 years!


• High Yield US is 1.000 bps above US government - this means 50-60 pct default versus all-time high of 36-38% (We do need funding rates down before this becomes steal, but it is getting closer + (Benchmark you can use HYG US)


• Bank loans - trading at 70+80 cents in the Dollar


• Private Equity deals is extremely cheap


• Banks are AAA (In the case of Denmark at least)


• Pakistan Sovereign debt trading @ 85 pct chance of default

Some things are lacking as well:

• Housing market still has 4.5 mio. unsold homes,


• The crisis is moving from financial to real economy meaning more savings less spending


• Bank getting recapitalized helps, but they still need to raise more private capital


• The "plan" will mean crowding out private capital and most likely creating unfair competitons between public and private banks


• US election. Whoever wins is a loser as they will have to wind down spending, increase taxes..... and implement stupid regulatory frameworks

So what I am trying to say remains:

This is going to be like in the 1970s:

(Note: Any resemblance with my Senior Partner Lars Christensen on the above picture is random - for the record Paul Breitner is much better looking!)

Disco, Paul Breitner hair, color nightmare, big government(read useless), inflation pressure, non+performance of equity (broadbased indicies), now even Brown wants to do Bretton Wood which was last "seen" in the 1970s - so ...my unqualifed, non-predictive response remains:

• If this is going to be recession then its 1150-1200 in SnP in Q4+Q1 + as market has priced the R-word, plus manager underweight stock benchmarks


• If the nasty D-word, as in depression is what we will have then 765.00 our ultimate target comes into play

The fact remains --- Below 1000 in SnP there is 5-7 pct return for cash generating, margin business, below 850 ish its oversold and cheap.. 1100-1300 becomes a game of where economies are going, how fast rates will normalise and how much Bernanke et al can distroy with their mistimed regulation and management.

In closing I will note two more things:

1. Everyone I know wants to sell rallies, like the whole CNBC crew, my own sales-traders, and analysts -- they are like Cramer - all into cash! Now! The balanced portfolio should add stocks now not sell....


2. 3.000, yes 3.000 stocks had Morning Star formation in the Us yesterday......(http://www.traderslog.com/morning-star.htm

Remember in chinese language the sign for crisis and opportunity is the same.

Be safe,

Steen